{"id":568,"date":"2011-02-18T21:25:35","date_gmt":"2011-02-19T01:25:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/?p=568"},"modified":"2011-02-18T21:25:35","modified_gmt":"2011-02-19T01:25:35","slug":"against-against","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/2011\/02\/18\/against-against\/","title":{"rendered":"2012: Against Against"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lev Manovich inverts the conventional way of looking at how photography forced a change on painting: &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/lab.softwarestudies.com\/2008\/11\/softbook.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Thus,  rather than thinking of modern art as a liberation (from representation  and documentation), we can see it as a kind of psychosis \u2013 an intense,  often torturous examination of the contents of its psyche, the memories  of its glamorous past lives, and the very possibilities of speaking. At  first this psychosis produced brilliant insights and inspired visions  but eventually, as the mental illness progressed, it degenerated into  endless repetitions. <\/a>&#8221; (pg 282. 2008 draft of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/lab.softwarestudies.com\/2008\/11\/softbook.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Software Takes Command<\/a>)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A parallel observation also holds true for contemporary poetry. With  the rise of the printing press, it lost its base as the deliverer of  news. As novels and stories and journalism arrived direct, poetry sought new terrain in which to establish  continued relevance. In the same way that painting turned to the subject  of painting, poetry turned to the subject of its substrate: language.  Contemporary poems are about language. This truism is stated often: <em>p<\/em><em>oetry is about language.<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Character, story, and observations of nature are already  comprehensively covered by many other media. The poetic avant garde  along with philosophy is now in the business of investigating the tropes  and turns of language: it investigates <em>how things are said<\/em>; and  it investigates these issues sonically, culturally and procedurally with an eye to destabilize <em> how we receive what is said<\/em>.  Unfortunately, where this focus, at the birth of several movements such  as Dada or LANGUAGE, led to superlative works which activated levels of  unprecedented discourse; now, perhaps there is the sense (I have it)  that poetry has reached a strange impasse.<\/p>\n<p>Burroughs and Gysin spawned a revolution. OULIPO cemented its  cerebral appeal. In response to the commodification of creativity and  the stable narrative voice (i.e. the repressed voice), poetry adopted a cut and paste collage methodology  of hallucinatory deflections. Subsequently, appropriation became a  key methodology of the conceptual elite.<em> <\/em>I agree with Kenneth Goldsmith only  partially when he says (in the intro to <a href=\"http:\/\/ubu.com\/concept\/against_expression.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Against Expression<\/em><\/a> a new ubuweb anthology of conceptual lit)\u00a0: <a href=\"http:\/\/ubu.com\/concept\/AgainstExpressionTOC-Essays.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&#8220;With  the rise of the Web, writing has met its photography. By that, I mean  that writing has encountered a situation similar to that of painting  upon the invention of photography, a technology so much better at doing\u00a0  what the art form had been trying to do that, to survive, the \ufb01eld had  to alter its course radically. If photography was striving for sharp  focus, painting was forced to go soft, hence impressionism. Faced with  an unprecedented amount of available digital text, writing needs to  rede\ufb01ne itself to adapt to the new environment of textual abundance.&#8221;<\/a> (pg. xvii, <em>Against Expression<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>As I said, I partially agree, here&#8217;s why: The printing press and  typewriter were already poetry&#8217;s photography. The web is yet another  animal entirely.<\/p>\n<p>Isn&#8217;t the dilemma now that we are all inundated in a massive  onslaught of word spew every day? Do we need to construct more of it? \u00a0Is the only space left for poetry a narrow  ledge of irony, and a ctrl+c ctrl+v heartbeat? Conceptual approaches of writing will continue on their own path, \ufb01nding\u00a0solutions to their own lines of inquiry.<\/p>\n<p>In the next few posts, I will be exploring other paths, challenges and difficult potentialities digital literature has before it.\u00a0These are basic changes\u00a0occurring\u00a0in the operating system\u00a0of how we write at the root level.\u00a0Specifically, the development of a\u00a0<em>living language, <\/em>assimilated into motion graphics and code embodied. Word as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Spime\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">spime<\/a>. What I will be proposing here is very\u00a0speci\ufb01c to those so inclined to this approach. To paraphrase Sol LeWitt: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tufts.edu\/programs\/mma\/fah188\/sol_lewitt\/paragraphs%20on%20conceptual%20art.htm\">&#8220;I  do not advocate a digital form of  poetry for all poets. I have found  that it has worked well for me while  other ways have not. It is one way  of making poetry; other ways suit  other poets. Nor do I think all  digital poetry merits the viewers  attention. Digital poetry is only  good when both programming and poetry are good&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lev Manovich inverts the conventional way of looking at how photography forced a change on painting: &#8220;Thus, rather than thinking of modern art as a liberation (from representation and documentation), we can see it as a kind of psychosis \u2013 an intense, often torturous examination of the contents of its psyche, the memories of its [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conceptual","category-thesis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/568","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=568"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/568\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=568"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=568"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glia.ca\/conu\/digitalPoetics\/prehistoric-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=568"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}